Report Finds America Rejects Targeting Setting-Up Policy Debate

In its announcement that it would convene a series of public roundtables to address developing privacy issues, the Federal Trade Commission requested empirical data on consumer privacy expectations. In response to that request, researchers at the University of California at Berkeley and the University of Pennsylvania have released a study entitled "Americans Reject Tailored Advertising." Survey data reported in the study found that 66% of Americans reject targeted advertising online; 86% reject such ads when told they are made possible through online data collection. The study also makes the case that Americans would like much stricter laws governing the data collected online and higher penalties for failures to comply.

The study did not explore consumers' perceptions of the role played by targeted advertising in providing free content to users or their willingness to pay for content in the absence of that advertising support. The House Energy and Commerce Committee has announced its intent to address these issues in the current session of Congress. In the absence of alternative empirical data, this study will feature prominently in the policy debate about regulating behavioral targeting in the U.S. and Europe.

Marketing Industry Groups Propose Behavioral Advertising Guidelines

On July 2, 2009, five marketing industry associations jointly published a set of voluntary behavioral marketing guidelines entitled “Self-Regulatory Principles for Online Behavioral Advertising.” The American Association of Advertising Agencies, the Association of National Advertisers, the Direct Marketing Association, the Interactive Advertising Bureau and the Better Business Bureau developed the standards, which correspond to the self-regulatory principles proposed by the Federal Trade Commission (“FTC”).

Behavioral advertising involves collecting and analyzing information about consumer online behavior for marketing-related purposes, such as serving targeted ads, or developing purchase propensity models. In the U.S., the practice has come under scrutiny by consumer groups, legislators and the FTC. The FTC published a second report on its own proposed self-regulatory principles on February 12, 2009.

The new self-regulatory guidelines are based on seven principles: Education, Transparency, Consumer Control, Data Security, Consent to Material Changes, Sensitive Data and Accountability. The principles call on participating organizations to (i) conduct outreach campaigns to educate consumers about behavioral advertising, (ii) provide clear disclosures about their online behavioral advertising practices (including notices at data collection points), (iii) allow consumers to choose whether their data is used for behavioral advertising, (iv) provide security for consumer information and limit its retention, (v) obtain consumer consent to material changes regarding the use of their information, and (vi) require parental consent for the use of information collected from children under the age of 13. The principles also call for establishing an accountability program for monitoring compliance with the guidelines and reporting non-compliance to appropriate government agencies. The Better Business Bureau and the Direct Marketing Association are currently working together to develop accountability mechanisms, which are intended to be in place by early 2010.

The publication detailing the Self-Regulatory Principles is available at www.iab.net/behavioral-advertisingprinciples.