Tag Archives: American Bar Association

President Obama Nominates Ohlhausen to be FTC Commissioner

Posted on July 25, 2011 by Hunton & Williams LLP

As reported in BNA’s Privacy Law Watch, on July 19, 2011, President Obama announced his intention to nominate Maureen K. Ohlhausen to the Federal Trade Commission. Obama sent his official nomination to the Senate on July 21, 2011. If approved, Ohlhausen will serve a seven-year term beginning on September 26, 2011, replacing Commissioner William E. Kovacic.

Continue reading…

Tags: , , , , ,

Regulating Privacy Across Borders in the Digital Age

Posted on November 18, 2010 by Hunton & Williams LLP

On November 10, 2010, the American Bar Association’s Section of Antitrust Law’s International Committee and Corporate Counseling Committee hosted a webinar on “Regulating Privacy Across Borders in the Digital Age: An Emerging Global Consensus or Vive la Difference?”.  A panel of senior officials and private sector experts provided insights on emerging cross-border data privacy and security issues.  Hunton & Williams partner Lisa Sotto was tapped to moderate an outstanding panel which included Billy Hawkes, Commissioner, Office of the Data Protection Commissioner, Ireland; Jennifer Stoddart, Commissioner, Office of the Privacy Commissioner, Canada; Hugh Stevenson, Deputy Director, Office of International Affairs, Federal Trade Commission; and Bojana Bellamy, Director of Data Privacy, Accenture (UK) Limited.  The high-profile speakers explored various privacy issues that have raised regulatory concerns around the world, including issues on behavioral advertising, cloud computing and data breaches.

Taken from a portion of the webinar, each panelist addressed their thoughts on the major issues that will dramatically change the privacy landscape over the next year.  In addition, they further discussed the revisions proposed in the EU Directive on Privacy and Electronic Communications.  Listen to the audio clip now.

Tags: , , , , , , , ,

FTC Set to Appeal the Red Flags Rule Exemption for Attorneys and Law Firms

Posted on March 1, 2010 by Hunton & Williams LLP

On February 25, 2010, the Federal Trade Commission filed a notice that it is appealing the D.C. District Court’s December 28, 2009 judgment in favor of the American Bar Association in American Bar Association v. FTC.  The District Court’s summary judgment held that the FTC’s Identity Theft Red Flags Rule (“Red Flags Rule” or the “Rule”) does not apply to attorneys or law firms.  The Rule implements Sections 114 and 315 of the Fair and Accurate Credit Transactions Act.  In relevant part, the Rule requires creditors and financial institutions that offer or maintain certain accounts to implement an identity theft prevention program.  The program must be designed to detect, prevent and mitigate the risk of identity theft.  Prior to the district court’s decision, the FTC had taken the position in publications and numerous panels that attorneys and law firms meet the Rule’s definition of “creditor” because they allow clients to pay for legal services after the services are rendered.

To read more about the Red Flags Rule, please see our previous blog posts. 

View the FTC’s notice of appeal.

Tags: , , ,

Court Finds that Lawyers Are Not Subject to the FTC’s Identity Theft Red Flags Rule

Posted on October 29, 2009 by Hunton & Williams LLP

It is being reported that the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia agreed this morning with the American Bar Association’s argument that the FTC’s Identity Theft Red Flags Rule ("Red Flags Rule" or the "Rule") does not apply to lawyers.  The Rule implements Section 114 and 315 of the Fair and Accurate Credit Transactions Act (the "FACT Act").  In relevant part, the Rule requires creditors and financial institutions that offer or maintain certain accounts to implement an identity theft prevention program.  The program must be designed to detect, prevent, and mitigate the risk of identity theft. The FTC has interpreted the definition of "creditor" broadly.  The Commission has taken the position in publications and numerous panels that lawyers and law firms meet the definition of creditor because they allow clients to pay for legal services after the services are rendered.  For law firms (as well as for other entities that the FTC deems subject to its enforcement jurisdiction), November 1, 2009 is the deadline for compliance with the provisions of the Rule that require implementation of an identity theft prevention program.

Continue reading…

Tags: , , , , ,

As Red Flags Deadline Looms, Attempts to Limit Scope Advance

Posted on October 22, 2009 by Hunton & Williams LLP

The November 1st deadline for compliance with the FTC’s Red Flags Rule Identity Theft Prevention Program requirements is rapidly approaching.  Of late, there has been a flurry of activity aimed at limiting the scope of the rule.  The Red Flags Rule, which was jointly promulgated by several federal agencies in November 2007, requires all “creditors” that offer or maintain a “covered account” to implement a written identity theft prevention program.  A “creditor” is defined broadly to include “any person who regularly extends, renews, or continues credit.”  In March 2009, the Federal Trade Commission (“FTC”) published a how-to guide for businesses to comply with the Red Flags Rule that confirmed the FTC will broadly construe the rule, stating that the definition of a “creditor” includes all businesses that “provide goods or services and bill customers later.”

Continue reading…

Tags: , ,