Monthly Archives: June 2010

Emerging Privacy Issues in Bankruptcy

The emergence of information privacy issues over the last decade has led to increased scrutiny of public representations that companies make regarding their information practices.  As a result of consumer privacy expectations and legal requirements, these representations are typically found in a company’s website privacy notice.  Too often, however, companies make commitments regarding their information practices that are difficult to meet and fail to anticipate changes in business circumstances (such as mergers or sales of assets).  Such commitments may prove damaging to the company, its investors and creditors.  Read more in an article published by GC New York on June 10, 2010, by Lisa J. Sotto, Scott H. Bernstein and Boris Segalis.

Tags: , , , ,

Centre Offers Ten Recommendations in Response to Commerce Department Inquiry

The Centre for Information Policy Leadership at Hunton & Williams LLP made ten recommendations in response to the U.S. Department of Commerce’s notice of inquiry, “Information Privacy and Innovation in the Internet Economy.”  The Centre’s recommendations strongly suggest that organizational accountability is the key to providing the flexibility needed to use information robustly while protecting the interest of individuals in maintaining private space in a digital age:

“The flexibility to be innovative must be conditioned on the organization’s accountability for the manner in which it uses, manage, and protects data.  … To strike the appropriate balance between the value created by data use and the risk that use poses to privacy, organizations must implement privacy processes that are as dynamic as their business processes.” 

Continue reading…

Tags: , ,

Hunton & Williams LLP Expands Global Privacy Practice Adding Counsel Wim Nauwelaerts in Brussels

Hunton & Williams LLP announces the expansion of its leading Global Privacy and Information Management practice with the addition on August 1, 2010, of Wim Nauwelaerts as Counsel in the Brussels office.  Formerly counsel in Hogan Lovells’ Brussels office, Mr. Nauwelaerts brings 15 years of experience in international privacy, data protection and information security law.  He has a broad range of experience in the area of European data protection, and focuses specifically on data privacy issues for healthcare and life sciences clients.  Read the press release.

Tags: ,

Privacy Settings on Social Networking Sites May Determine Protection Under Stored Communications Act

On May 26, 2010, the court in Crispin v. Christian Audigier, Inc. quashed portions of subpoenas seeking the disclosure of private messages sent through Facebook and MySpace.  The court left open the question of whether Crispin’s wall postings and comments should be disclosed pending a more thorough review of his online privacy settings. 

Continue reading…

Tags: , , , , , , , ,

UK Data Breach Reporting Soars

On May 28, 2010, the UK Information Commissioner’s Office issued a press release stating that it has been notified of more than 1,000 data security breaches since it began keeping records in late 2007.  There is no mandatory reporting requirement in the UK, so the actual number of breaches is likely to be significantly higher.  The ICO’s press release notes that the majority of breaches occur as a result of human or technical errors, such as employees improperly disclosing data to third parties or automated machines sending out letters to the wrong addresses.

Continue reading…

Tags: ,

Canadian Bills Propose Security Breach Notification Requirements and Anti-Spam Regulations

On May 25, 2010, two privacy-related bills were introduced in the Parliament of Canada: the Fighting Internet and Wireless Spam Act (“FISA” or Bill C-28) and the Safeguarding Canadians’ Personal Information Act (Bill C-29) amending the Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents Act (“PIPEDA”).

Bill C-29 is the long-awaited government response to the five-year mandatory review of PIPEDA.  The centerpiece of the bill is a new disclosure provision for security breaches related to personal information.  Key elements in the security breach notification proposal include:

  • Any “material breach of security safeguards involving personal information” would have to be reported to the Privacy Commissioner of Canada.
  • A determination of whether the breach is “material” would be made by the entity, based on the sensitivity of the information, the number of individuals affected and whether there is a systemic problem.
  • Notification would have to be made “as soon as feasible” individuals affected by the breach “if it is reasonable in the circumstances to believe that the breach creates a real risk of significant harm to the individual.”
  • A determination of whether there is a “real risk” would be made by the entity, based on the sensitivity of the information and the probability that the personal information has been, is being or will be misused.

Continue reading…

Tags: ,

German DPAs Require Data Exporters to Verify Safe Harbor Compliance

On April 29, 2010, German data protection authorities issued a resolution regarding the obligations of German data exporters with respect to U.S. data importers that have self-certified under the Safe Harbor program.  By requiring additional diligence when transferring data to Safe Harbor-certified entities, the resolution may appear to raise questions with respect to the European Commission’s decision that Safe Harbor certification is sufficient to demonstrate an adequate level of privacy protection.

Continue reading…

Tags: , , ,

Article 29 Working Party Calls on FTC to Investigate Online Retention and Anonymization Policies

In a letter to the U.S. Federal Trade Commission dated May 26, 2010, the Article 29 Working Party expressed concerns regarding the retention and anonymization policies of Google, Yahoo! and Microsoft.  Specifically, the Working Party requested that the FTC examine the compatibility of the three search engine providers’ actions with provisions of Section 5 of the FTC Act which prohibits unfair or deceptive trade practices.

Continue reading…

Tags: , , , , , , ,